The new petition has been filed by group of LGBT community challenging a ban on gay sex, they argued that Section 377 of India’s penal code, which prohibits “carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or Read More …
Category: Uncategorized
CRIMINAL CASE: MAHMOOD AND ORS Vs. STATE OF BIHAR16/02/2000 (SC)
Facts of the case A dacoity was committed in the House of informant Bhupendra Mohan Singh, situated in Phulwari village, on 9th June, 1985 at about 7 : 15 p.m. 10 to 15 dacoits raided his house. These dacoits took Read More …
CRMINAL CASE: MASUMSHA HASANASHA MUSALMAN Vs.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA24/02/2000 (SC)
Facts of the case Between 7 and 8 p.m. on 25.8.92 SaojiGamajiJadhav who belongs to the scheduled caste was done away to death. On the fateful day the deceased returned to the house at dusk and after some time left Read More …
Gays and Lesbians are not Third Genders: Supreme Court
Supreme Court on 30 June 2016, clarified that gays and lesbians will not get benefit under the OBC category as they are not included in the definition of ‘third gender’ like the transgender. A clarification which was sought by the Read More …
CRIMINAL CASE: IQBAL SINGH NARANG & ORS VS. VEERAN NARANG 30.11.2011 (SC)
Facts of the case The Appellant No.1 filed an Ejectment Application under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, for eviction of the Respondent from the premises in question. The said Respondent filed Crl. RBT Complaint Read More …
Criminal Case: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. BalramMihani&OrsFEBRUARY 1, 2010 (SC)
Facts of the case The Station House Officer, Itarsi moved applications before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Itarsi for initiating proceedings against the respondents under Chapter VII-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for attachment and forfeiture of the Read More …
Criminal Case: Narinder Singh Arora vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Ors.December 05, 2011 (SC)
Facts of the case The appellant had filed a complaint against the respondents which was registered as FIR at New Delhi. Subsequently, the charges were framed against the respondents under Sections 498-A, 304-B read with Section-34 and Section 302 of Read More …
Criminal Case: Helios & Matheson Information Technology Ltd. &Ors vs. Rajeev Sawhney&AnrDecember 16, 2011 (SC)
Facts of the case Respondent No.1, Rajeev Sawhney filed Criminal Complaint before Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 417, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 120B of IPC by the petitioners. The complaint Read More …
Criminal Case: JethaBhayaOdedara vs. Ganga MaldebhaiOdedara and Anr. December 16, 2011 (SC)
Facts of the case 14th January, 2007,Makar Sankranti Day, the complainant-JethaBhayaOdedara, the petitioner was sitting at the house of AbhaArjan, along with NavganArasi, Rama ArasiJadeja, Suresh SanghanOdedara and a few ladies of the house, named, AarsiMunja, Maliben and Puriben. At Read More …
Criminal Case:DINBANDHU vs. STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.SEPTEMBER 23, 2011
Facts of the case The appellant, who was an accused in a complaint case under sections 192, 193, 196, 200, 420, 406, 467, 468 and 471 of the Penal Code, was granted anticipatory bail by the High Court. The bail Read More …